Benefits of Positive Relationships in Childcare Setting

Benefits of Positive Relationships in Childcare Setting Farah Rehman 1. Recognise how positive relationships promote children’s- well -being Building positive relationships with young children is an essential task and a foundational component of good teaching. All children grow and thrive in the context of close and dependable relationships that provide love and nurturance, security, and responsive interactions. A positive adult-child relationship built on trust, understanding, and caring will foster children’s cooperation and motivation and increase their positive outcomes at school (Webster-Stratton, 1999). Good. In a review of empirically derived risk and protective factors associated with academic and behavioural problems at the beginning of school, Huffman et al. 2000) identified that having a positive preschool experience and a warm and open relationship with their teacher or child care provider are important protective factors for young children. These protective factors operate to produce direct, ameliorative effects for children in at-risk situations (Luthar, 1993). Next, we describe some of the key ingred ients for relationship building. In order for adults to build meaningful positive relationships with children, it is essential to gain a thorough understanding of children’s preferences, interests, background, and culture. For very young children and children with special needs, this information is most often accessed by observing what children do and by speaking directly to parents and other caregivers. With this information, adults can ensure that their play with children is fun, that the content of their conversations is relevant, and those they communicate respect for children’s origins. Whenever possible, this kind of information exchange should be as reciprocal as possible. That is, adults should be sharing their own interests, likes, backgrounds, and origins with children as well. Good. Practical Strategies for Building Positive Relationships †¢ Distribute interest surveys that parents fill out about their child †¢ Greet every child at the door by name †¢ Follow a child’s lead during play †¢ Have a conversation over snack †¢ Conduct home visits †¢ Listen to a child’s ideas and stories and be an appreciative audience †¢ Send positive notes home †¢ Provide praise and encouragement †¢ Share information about yourself and find something in common with the child †¢ Ask children to bring in family photos and give them an opportunity to share it with you and their peers †¢ Post children’s work †¢ Have a â€Å"Star† of the week who brings in special things from home and gets to share them during circle time †¢ Acknowledge a child’s effort †¢ Give compliments liberally †¢ Call a child’s parents to say what a great day she or he having in front of the child †¢ Find out what a child’s favourite book is and read it to the whole class †¢ Have sharing days †¢ Make â€Å"all about me† books and share them at circle time †¢ Write all of the special things about A child on a T-shirt and let him or her wear it †¢ Play a game with a child †¢ Play outside with a child †¢ Ride the bus with a child †¢ Go to an extracurricular activity with the child †¢ Learn a child’s home language †¢ Give hugs, high fives, and thumbs up for accomplishing tasks †¢ Hold a child’s hand †¢ Call a child after a bad day and say â€Å"I’m sorry we had a bad day today – I know tomorrow is going to be better!† †¢ Tell a child how much he or she was missed Some useful techniques that can be applied. Although this knowledge is good, I would have liked you to focus more on the benefits to children of different types of relationships, such as friendships etc. 2. Analyse the importance of the key worker system for children â€Å"Key Worker†. The â€Å"Key Person† role is to build positive relationships with particular children, and work closely with the families of those children. The term â€Å"Key Worker† refers to a role which involves communicating with different professionals to ensure that services coordinate and to work at a more systemic, strategic level within nurseries (Elfer, Goldschmied Selleck, 2005). The â€Å"Key Person† role is the focus of this particular study. The current government guidance on the role of the Key Person seems to place great weight on attachment theory as a driving point for the development of positive relationships in the Early Years. It is important to note that this research does not seek to examine different â€Å"attachment types†. Rather, it seeks to understand the adults’ perceptions of their roles in Early Years settings and the ways in which they ensure positive experiences for their key children. However, attachment theory, as the theoretical foundations of this study, cannot be ignored. John Bowlby’s (1969) theory of infant attachment sought to understand the relationships between infants and their caregivers. Further developments through Bell and Ainsworth’s (1970) Strange Situation led to the identification of attachment types, and a plethora of studies researching the relationships between these types and a child’s future development. Recognition of the impact of early attac hments on outcomes for children as they develop is well established as noted by Thompson (2008). Thompson looks at factors most directly associated with Bowlby’s original ideas, for example; relationship functioning, emotional regulation and social-cognitive capabilities. The conclusion is that the literature continues to support the argument that children labelled as ‘securely attached’ experience more positive outcomes in many areas. Thompson notes that the reasons behind this are not clear, though he draws attention to the literature which suggests sensitivity is an important factor. This may be quite relevant to understanding the relationships between Key Persons and children in Early Years settings, as the Key Person’s sensitivity to the child’s needs may be paramount to the dynamics of their relationship. Current guidance and the EYFS Good points highlighted above and relevant link made to attachment theory. As mentioned previously, attachment theory appears to have had a rather significant impact on current guidance, policies and practice with children and young people (Slater, 2007). It is also integral to the work of agencies such as Sure Start and social care. In order to understand what some practitioners may already know, it seems important to review some of the guidance that the government provides for early education settings. The Department for Education have recently changed the information on their website; however, following a recent consultation on the EYFS, there does not seem to be any indication of significant change to the Key Person role. Information previously available stated that: †¢ â€Å"A Key Person helps the baby or child to become familiar with the setting and To feel confident and safe within it. †¢ A Key Person develops a genuine bond with children and offers a settled, Close relationship. †¢ When children feel happy and secure in this way they are confident to explore and to try out new things. †¢ Even when children are older and can hold special people in mind for longer there is still a need for them to have a Key Person to depend on in the setting, such as their teacher or a teaching assistant.† – These guidelines came under the â€Å"Positive Relationships† principle, and whilst online access to this has now been archived, the translation of these points in to practice formed the initial focus of this piece of research. Due to this, they have remained within this paper. 3) Explain the benefits of building positive partnership with parents for children’s learning and development. When staff shares positive bonds with children’s families, it helps the staff feel more connected, valued, rewarded and appreciated. Staff can more easily respond to children’s needs by understanding a child’s relationship with their parents, carers and siblings. Staff can also develop a deeper understanding of how each family would like their child to be raised. Having a ‘bigger picture’ of a child’s world allows staff to relate to children in a way that makes them feel understood which then strengthens relationships. Relationships and partnerships assist staff feel confident and satisfied in their role of supporting the child and their development. Good points. Mutual benefits of partnerships Working together can help families and staff trust one another and communicate openly. When information is shared, families and staff are able to gain a deeper understanding of: how to work together to support children children’s behaviour at home and at the early childhood service the most effective ways to support children’s learning what children enjoy and what their strengths are resources for addressing children’s difficulties. Interacting within a partnership helps Families and staff: feel welcome, respected and valued feel comfortable, confident and supported in their roles feel a sense of satisfaction from the trust others place in them work through differences, allowing adults to continue working together to support children benefit from the resources, ideas and energy that others provide benefit from shared decision-making see things from other people’s perspective develop strong connections with children 9) feel a sense of satisfaction when children explore, learn and develop their skills 10) have more opportunities to discuss child development Babies and young children learn to be strong and independent through loving and secure relationships with parents and carers and other family members such as grandparents. When children are looked after outside the home they can develop security and independence through having a key person to care for them. Children’s learning is helped when they feel safe and secure and when their parents and the people in settings they attend work together to ensure that the child’s needs are met. A key person such as a child minder provides a reassuring link with home so that children can cope with being separated from the special people in their lives. Attachments are the emotional bonds that are made between young children, their parents and other cares such as the Key Person. All of these important people have a special role to play in providing the right kind of environment for children where they will flourish. Environments are not just physical spaces because they are the atmosphere created through warm and caring relationships, where children are respected and valued and their well-being comes before anything else. In these environments children’s voices are listened to and they thrive socially and emotionally. Describe how to develop positive relationships within the early years setting, making reference to principles of effective communication Effective communication with both children and parents are very important in order to develop positive relationships. Children who feel valued and who enjoy being with you will respond better. Due to this, they are likely to enjoy playing and learning and are more likely to behave well. The basis of forming a relationship with children is to consider what their needs may be and to adapt the way in which you work to meet these needs. It is important to recognise if children have any difficulties in communication. There are many types of difficulties that need to be recognized: Speech and language delay Dyspraxia Muscle weakness or deformity Emotional problems Ear infection Expressive difficulties Receptive difficulties Stuttering Children who have difficulties in communication should be supported. The practioner should: Be patient Allow children time and space in which to speak Do not talk over children Do not speak for the child Do not interrupt the child Consider using pictures for children so they can communicate their needs.

James Prescott Joule :: biographies biography bio

James Prescott Joule was born December 24, in 1818. James Joule was born into the wealthy brewing family of Benjamin and Alice Joule. In 1847 James Joule married Amelia Grimes, a daughter of the Liverpool Comptroller of Customs. James Joule and Amelia had three children: Benjamin Arthur (born 1849), Alice Amelia (born 1852) and a son who died in 1854 along with his wife during child birth. In 1843 James Joule read his paper to the British Association, entitled "On the Calorific Effects of Magneto-Electricity and on the Mechanical Value of Heat." This paper described the physical constant that showed that heat was a form of energy. This constant is known as "J", or "Joule's Equivalent." The unit of heat, work and internal energy are measured in joules (J). James Prescott Joule died October 11 in 1889. James Joule is buried in Westminster Abbey along with other famous people. Those Who Inspired John Dalton James Joule was tutored as a young boy by John Dalton: John Dalton was a well known Chemist and Physicist. John Dalton was born September 6 in 1766 and died July 27 in 1844. John Dalton is most recognized for his findings, which later is known as "the atomic theory". The atomic theory is the theory of the nature of matter. It states that: "all matter is composed of atoms." Lord Kelvin James Joule worked with Lord Kelvin on experiments, which later became know as the Joule-Thomson Effect: Lord Kelvin was a well known Mathematical Physicist. The well known "Lord Kelvin" born as William Thomson, June 26 in 1824 and later died December 17 in 1907. William Thomson later became the 1st Baron Kelvin, he was known as "Lord Kelvin." Lord Kelvin is most recognized for his work in thermodynamics and Kelvin temperature scale. Rudolf Julius Emanuel Clausius James Joule was inspired by the work of Rudolf Julius Emanuel Clausius: Rudolf Julius Emanuel Clausius was a Physicist and a Mathematician. Rudolf Julius Emanuel Clausius was born January 2 in 1822, and died August 24 in 1888. Rudolf Julius Emanuel Clausius is most recognized for his work in thermodynamics. Rudolf Julius Emanuel Clausius introduced the concept of entropy. The Experiments (Known Today as Research) Paddle Wheel Experiment James Joule's Paddle Wheel Experiment determined the existence of a relation between heat and mechanical work. He established this by a method involving the churning water in a calorimeter by means of paddles driven by various falling weights. Through this experiment James Joule established what we call today the First Law of Thermodynamics.

Lin Zexu

The letter prepared by Lin Zexu is written in a kind, compassionate tone. The high-profile government administrator writes to the British queen in an attempt to persuade her to help the Chinese prevent opium traffic in their land. Although his pleadings were eloquent and far-reaching, he was not successful in his attempt since the British undertook no action. Although the letter never made it to the Queen, it was published in a British newspaper (Travis, Hanes, 2002, p.41). The responsibility Lin Zexu places on the British was serious in many ways. He blames upon the British their disrespectful treatment of the nation that has for centuries maintained good relations with them and enabled them to realize large profits from their trade. The official points out that this trade was so beneficial for the British that they did not hesitate to sail to China from another end of the world. He also stresses that British merchants can be both scrupulous and unscrupulous: â€Å"among the unscrupulous are those who bring opium to China to harm the Chinese; they succeed so well that this poison has spread far and wide in all the provinces† (Zexu, 1839). Lin Zexu especially stresses that the Chinese government was nothing but nice toward foreign traders. They (at least in the opinion of the official) were granted every right so that they could feel comfortable in the area. However, many of the merchants chose to act in a dishonest way, causing a situation that necessitated the writing of the letter. Lin also emphasizes the favorable treatment of people from England, noting that â€Å"the Celestial Empire, following its traditional policy of treating foreigners with kindness, has been doubly considerate towards the people from England† (Zexu, 1839).   He is quick to connect this trade with the current prosperity of the English, omitting perhaps by mistake the fact that Britain traded with a number of countries, and a broad base of partners also contributed to its current prosperity. The official also points out that the stuff brought from China was composed mainly of â€Å"useful items† whereas opium is hardly so (Zexu, 1839).   Lin describes a variety of problems that China experiences because of the opium imported on British ships. He talks about the poison that is killing people. He also talks not only about the ugly nature of the opium, but also about the inability of the government to control the country. He blames the British for disobedience of the Chinese laws, stating that they are responsible for the damage inflicted upon people who fall victim to the penalties envisaged in the local criminal law. Thus, he says, â€Å"since a Chinese could not peddle or smoke opium if foreigners had not brought it to China, it is clear that the true culprits of a Chinese`s death as a result of an opium conviction are the opium traders from foreign countries† (Zexu, 1839). This statement seems a little disputable, but it was not without reason: indeed, the nation has already set its laws, and whoever pushes a Chinese person to disregard those was clearly making a disservice to this person, putting him and his family in danger of capital punishment. The way Lin Zexu blames the British reveals a weakness in the position of the Chinese authorities. Clearly, the government was not able to control the spread of drugs through its own efforts, otherwise it would not need to do things like ask foreign governments for assistance in solving their internal problems. In the modern world, governments tend to cooperate to combat crime rings and smuggling; however, in the Victorian world, such hope was rather elusive. In addition, almost no government could dictate to another whether it needs to eliminate opium plantations or undertake any other measures for managing internal affairs. The way Lin Zexu puts it, which seems rather rude and lacking in diplomacy, is a true revelation of the extent to which China needs to get this problem solved. Talking to the British queen in his letter, he says that â€Å"it is hereby suggested that you destroy and plow under all of these opium plants and grow food crops instead, while issuing an order to punish severely anyone who dares to plant opium poppies again† (Zexu, 1839).   He ends this paragraph with the pending question â€Å"why do you not do it?† (Zexu, 1839). This once again demonstrates reliance on the British to get the problem solved. The main reason why Queen Victoria ignored the request could have something to with the internal situation in Britain. The nation lived for the most part off overseas trade and wanted to preserve its source of income. If British ships were implicated in opium trade in China, this probably did not bother the queen that much. In those times, monarchs were far less interested in preserving the good name of their countries. After all, the British Crown could be accused of taking part in the trade or sponsoring it. In this light, it made sense to sort issues out by not responding to the message. This is why Lin Zexu was not successful even though his message is quite appealing in style. Closing the discussion, it is worthwhile noting that the problems with opium trade in China closely resemble many of the issues that exist in the modern world. Many people suffer from adverse actions on the part of foreign and their own governments that either overlook or fail to suppress harmful practices such as drug trade. Actually, drug trafficking persists on even a larger scale today. To this date, many governments fail to find an adequate framework for cooperation, losing their chance to overcome the problem. As in the times of Lin Zexu and Queen Victoria, there are many hidden motives involved so that officials are often interested in preserving the business that helps them make money. Therefore, this letter can serve as a useful source to consult for those willing to learn from the past mistakes. References Hanes III, W. T. and Sanello, F. (2002). The Opium Wars. Naperville, Ill.: Sourcebooks. Zexu, L. (1839). Letter to Queen Victoria.            

A “Cold War” has the definition of, “a conflict...

A â€Å"Cold War† has the definition of, â€Å"a conflict characterized by the use of means short of sustained overt military action†. This is exactly what happened between two world superpowers, the United States, which was led by President Kennedy, and the Soviet Union, which was led by Premier Khrushchev, between the years of 1945 and 1990. The U.S. tried to keep communist contained so that it would not spread, but the U.S.S.R. had other plans. Though no large scale military attack between the two directly, there were several small skirmishes in which both countries had a hand in and high, war threatening moves were made by both sides. These small skirmishes and threatening movements by both sides caused the closest thing to WWIII publicly known†¦show more content†¦This is important because it shows the lengths the U.S. government would go to remove Castro from power. Eventually, diplomatic relations between Castro and the U.S. broke down, and with Castroà ¢â‚¬â„¢s influence, the U.S.’s and Latin America’s diplomatic relations broke down also. This was due to the fact that Castro’s influence on other South American countries was hurting America’s relationships with said countries, so the United States government felt that he had to go. To do this, the United States tried to hurt Cuba economically by putting a trade embargo on Cuba. This didn’t bring about the desired results, because the Soviet Union helped them out economically, increasing relations between the two. Due to the failure of the trade embargo Eisenhower’s administration planned the Bay of Pigs invasion, which was later carried out by Kennedy. This invasion involved training ex-Cubans militarily, and sending them back to Cuba to overthrow Castro with support of U.S. air support. Though the Soviets and Castro new of the invasion date, April 17th, 1961, President Kennedy continued with the invasion as planned. The invasion was an embarrassing failure, due to the fact that at the last moment, Kennedy decided against providing air support. Kennedy admitted to the American public that the U.S. government was behind the failed invasion, but instead of backlash from the public, Kennedy gained